The Americans - look in the mirror,
if you can.
(Full version) ZDNet Talkback, ZDNet AnchorDesk Message Board.

My name is Vladimir Gouliaev. I am a medical doctor, working with YourHealth911.com

I consider myself not as citizen of a country, but as a member of the Earth family. I think that nations play the same role on Earth as organs play in our bodies. Countries as human organs cannot live completely independent of each other.

Who stands behind the terrorists? by Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev

What can we do about terrorism? by Dr. Robert M. Bowman

In the body independence without normal relationship with other organs causes a disease. The same with countries. We just need to find a 'healthy' consensus between different parts of one system (Earth).

For certain reasons I sent a message ("The Americans - look in the mirror") with grammatical mistakes to ZDNet 'Talkback' (TELL US YOUR OPINION). ... and I saw what I expected - it was not published.

I intentionally made my first post with the grammatical mistakes.
I had wanted to see how many responses will be given; whether the priority of importance will be the bad English, and only then the country. Why? Because ... I know that Americans strongly believe in their power and victory, but people make history and people behave according to how they think (we may think we are right but in reality it could be a mistake). It does not matter what you believe in, but if you have a wrong approach, you will receive 100% bad results no matter what (money, power, etc.). With all our power and money we cannot change the laws of Nature, because Nature created us, and we cannot be higher than the Thing that created us. It will always be that a wrong mind creates wrong actions and then there is no escape from bad results.

I just want people to understand that if anybody, any country will break their own laws on which their society is based on, without the understanding of the impact on their future, it will bring that country to a dangerous zone. When human beings are doing things without understanding - the humans are violating the laws of Nature and are paying for it. Why?  Because human beings have consciousness and should act as good thinking people. If he/she does not - Nature forces us to think by creating circumstances that do not leave us any other choice (we will be punished or we will find a solution). It works like a super giant computer system with certain unchangeable/unupgradable software. Here we have a pure analogy with a program algorithm, but nothing in common with God. Therefore, laws of Nature can be translated as real computer language (understandable for humans) and can be applied to everyday usage/technologies and highly accurate prognoses/changes of our future. We cannot change or be stronger than the laws of Nature which regulate everything, including human life (otherwise we would have destroyed humanity a long time ago). We can fight with Nature, but we never won before, and we cannot win in the future (for example, what future do you see for artificial drugs?). Those laws are the common unshakable laws for all creatures and all matter in the universe. I wish we could understand the rules of life itself and use them instead of useless fighting for satisfaction of our vanity (whom are we fighting with? - with ourselves).

Power is not the warranty of the "bright future". It needs to be complimented with consciousness. To act because you have "bad feelings" and too many emotions is the same as animals acting on their instincts when they sense danger. People have consciousness to think how far it could lead them.
The more consciousness, the greater insight into the future that will lead to more safety in the future. However, consciousness needs to comply with the laws designed by Nature (the first priority); then humanly designed laws should comply with what we understand from laws of Nature. Any reversed priorities are a path to troubles. Our past has 100% match with what I said, but how much more proof/disaster does humanity need to grasp the final understanding of it? We are free to do whatever we want to do, but we are not free from the consequences of our desires.

Below is the version of the post to ZDNet as it should be:

The Americans - look in the mirror.  Where are you going?  First - you forgave one Bill's © indiscretions "I did not have sex with that woman"; but it was unacceptable in the past, (the country, not girls should be the priority on the mind of any leader of a country).  Second - you are forgiving another Bill's (G, MS) actions to kill democracy and freedom (it begun from software, now it follows to hardware and governments, then ...). What else are of value are you willing to sacrifice? Political freedom? Unity of the American Nation? Freedom of speech? Did the Americans ever forgive attacks on any of their freedoms in the past? Do you see any match with motto of Hitler ("one country, one nation, one language") and motto of Bill #2 (one company, only Microsoft software, only Microsoft operating system)? If you do not see things under your noses, it's OK, but the outcome of the USA/World will be the same as with Hitler (as Hitler could have had).  Anyone who will try to conquer the world because of his/her vanity will cause a global disaster, as it always was in the past. If you want to see World War III, dead bodies together with dead computers - buy Microsoft products and support MS. You act exactly the same as those who supported Hitler (they saw only the good things that Hitler did, but did not see or did not want to see where he lead them). Americans, do you want to turn into the new Nazis (MS-Nazis or B.G.-Nazis, etc.)? Go ahead...

P.S. Is this logic too complicated to follow?  Anyway, we will face what we deserve. Unfortunately, lack of understanding is not an excuse for fate. Try to utilize your brains and you will see - you are the masters of your destiny, not God.

This letter is about the events of September 11th, 2001.  Microsoft is a part of what we need to be concerned with. We must think completely different to fix the predicament we now find ourselves in.

I offered you what I can and feel that I should - a clue to a way of globally preventing terrorism and causes of World War III (if you do not think so - think again). So, now it's your turn to take responsibility for your decision. A good one or bad one - it will be your freedom of choice. Remember (I repeat it again) - the rest will not be without consequences.

There are many reasons why I do not extend my "clues" to a better understanding. Who needs it - will find the answers.

If you do not accept my approach - do things the right way (as you understand) and try to do them better, we will face dire consequences together. This is a crucial moment for all humanity. You still have some time. I never give up - my hope dies last.

Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev, New York.

Replies of Brian Davidson:

Name: Brian Davidson

Email: Brian545@excite.com
Location: NY

Occupation: Sys Admin
______________________

Vladimir Gouliaev: "We cannot be higher than the Thing that created us."

Brian Davidson: " Well, we can because we have invented computers, software, cars, etc. We can think ahead a few steps, like in chess."
______________________

Vladimir Gouliaev: Brian Davidson, please, compare technology of Nature and humanity: memory - the best that humanity did with is compress 1 - Gig of information to a couple of inches box, Nature - fits information about any creature (up to huge dinosaur) into 1 cell. Can a human being create an artificial mechanism that will be equal to size and functions of a fly or a mosquito? We even cannot create an artificial one cell microorganism. About thinking of a few steps ahead: with all our knowledge and computers can we design a perfect ecosystem as Nature did? We only can destroy any ecosystem with ours "improvements". Even pets with humanly designed "super food" live 10-15 years less than their wild equivalents. OK, we can think better than animals but, apparently it's not enough to survive. We are dying from growing of cancer, heart diseases, super infection, food chemicals, ..., self-destructive behaviors. We still don't understand a relationship between consciousness and our being (physical matter), therefore, we cannot have any imagination how to get to another galaxy for half an hour without "wormholes, hyper space", etc. Just as no one can design a radio tuner without knowledge of radio waves same as nobody can achieve a real space travel without any understanding of its nature. So, we are smart compare with animals but ... what is good in thinking ahead a few steps in a wrong direction? Can we call a process of human self-annihilation as an example of superior mind? Nature can live without human beings, but can we live without Nature?

I have to say: we are making dangerous mistakes, due to the lack of understanding of real laws of our existence. For example, many people things that it's OK that MS violates our rights of free choice, free development etc., but they do not understand that if they allow it for MS - they automatically allow it for everyone including own government (according the law of Nature). They are agreed to lose freedom only in software area, but in reality they are losing everywhere (political, social, business, etc. areas). I am surprised that many people are thinking that MS first worries about its software quality. In my opinion, MS worries about to take over the world and software is one of its instruments. Therefore, MS software should contain tools to control its users. That's why we see (and will see) back doors, holes in half-backed Swiss cheese MS products. I guess that anti-MS hackers/crackers create worms and viruses not because MS is widely spread, because they see it, they told it, but nobody listened to it. Therefore, they chose a very bad way to fight for our freedom (worms, viruses), because they do not see a better way to explain it to us. They are like a resistance forces in evil empire. Therefore, the further MS goes to control the World - the more resistance MS has. But, we should classify this human reaction to violence as unavoidable due to the laws of human nature. I think, the right way to stop worms and viruses spread is to stop the reason of their existence: the company that spreads a violent unfair practice on the whole World. Like in order to stop any kind of terrorism - we need to stop the reasons of its existence first. Violence over violence never can be a solution (for humanity).

We can stop all future disasters, but if we think like, "MS is evil, but I cannot live without MS" - we won't escape from big trouble. To think is not enough now. We must think completely different, and our deeds should match our words.

Brian Davidson wrote: "Americans are not Nazis, Microcrap is." The Russian mafia is not Russians, The Russian mafia is a multinational gang based in Russia. So the American people, who support MS are not the Americans, they are MS men/women (Nazis). Any time when mass of Nazis will overcome "a critical mass", the "chain reaction" of disaster will happen.

The question is: how many people are ready to do what the country really needs (... if I am speaking - I am doing what I am speaking). You need to prove your love the USA not by only putting the American Flag on your car and house, but your deeds first. What do you think about the main reason of slow downing of the US economy? An absence of luck? Unpredictable circumstances? ... or people are doing things as their mind works, and we need to figure out why their thinking is changed, and what would be better for people's minds?

Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev
___________________________

<Vladimir said> Can a human being create an artificial mechanism that will be equal to size and functions of a fly or a mosquito? We even cannot create an artificial one cell microorganism. <

B.D.: And how long did it take nature to do that? On a computer, you can set forth evolution where "That, that does not swim, will die" and the computer will make symmetry, snake, and bacteria looking things that swim. All out of randomness of cubes comes incredible beauty.

________________________

V.G.: "How long did it take nature to do that?" According some completely scientific theory it took about 3 seconds (there are indirect proofs). Noosphera (it's not above mentioned theory). Particularly, this theory says that live appears simultaneously with physical matter and Earth also simultaneously appears with a complete set of life. Nobody believed at that time and hardly believe it now. ... but, when super deep drilling was reach layers of Earth that theoretically corresponds to the age of Earth - they were surprised: according to the analysis life at that time was not less saturated than now. In other words, in this Universe (Nature) exist a mechanism that allows to create life and non-life objects extremely fast. This is not a God, it's a technology with a different logic than what we have now. I was involved in a secret research about this issue in Russia. Here (in the USA) I applied some achievements on this fields and create the PHS biotechnology, Shock Diet based on this technology. It's an extremely complicated thing for a brief explanation, I just would say that in a future it will be a completely different mechanism of signal transmission (no radio waves), completely different types of computers etc.
We can compare the future level with what we have now as what we have now with Stone Age but in order to do it we should learn technologies that use the universe (Nature) instead what we are doing now.
________________________
V.G.: > Pets with humanly designed "super food" live 10-15 years less than their wild equivalents. <

B.D.: Chromium (and maybe Zinc) will extend the life of animals. Calorie restrictive
diets (15%), and sanitation. Iodine will remove some retardation and increase intelligence (Is salt iodized in Russia?). Fear factor maybe part of life expectancy, because wild animals are lean and have lots omega 3 fatty acids, unlike domestic farm animals that have none.

________________________
V.G.: According many researches our pets with all our "life extensions" anyway live 10-15 years less than the same wild animals. We cannot extend pet's live because we use methods that incompatible with pet's nature. It's about system of recognition: pet's body design for certain purposes and can properly recognize only certain natural ingredients/chemicals. The rest cause side effects. We can prolong only life of sick or weak pets. Artificial chemicals unable to prolong animal or human life. Duration of any life depends from different factors. Regular artificial chemicals can only decrease duration of normally functional life but never prolong. If you need to read more information - I can refer to a Web site.
________________________

V.G.: > OK, we can think better than animals but, apparently it's not enough to survive. <

B.D.: No. Its too much to survive. Our brains are hazardously large, above and beyond what is necessary to survive. But why? So we can extend evolution. That's why we make computers and cars etc. We are and have been steering evolution for a long time now.

________________________

V.G.: The biggest brain found in pure clinical idiot. Size of human brain does not have correlation with its intelligence (there is an opposite correlation for certain types of human head). Yes, we have potential for evolution, but I will repeat: common science has no clue what part of our brain should be developed and why. Therefore, result of our evolution is what we have now: we are on the edge of World War III. I did not want to describe a scenario. It could happen as nobody can imagine (like can you imagine in 1975 how the USSR would be destroyed?).
________________________

V.G.: > We are dying from cancer, heart diseases, super infection, food chemicals, self-destructive behaviors. <

B.D.: No. There are more cases of cancer but less people are dying from cancer. We are living longer than ever. Longer than we need to. We shouldn't live forever because it would not make genetic variety and turnover of genes. People will die because of "survival of the fittest."
________________________

V.G.: You need to take independent (non-pharmaceutical and non-AMS) statistics.
Every year in the USA is registered 1,500,000 new cases of cancer and this count is growing. Prostate cancer for 6 years grew in 8 times! Genetically (but more correctly to say biologically) we can live 300-400 years and look as young (20-30 years). (You can read more information about but without technology how to do it) ________________________


B.D.: AIDS could wipe out lots of people, but 10% of white Europeans are immune to AIDS due to a genetic mutation left over after the Black Death (bubonic plague). If we fightdeath too much, viruses will get more deadly, sometimes, or not?

________________________

V.G.: You are too tied to common medicine knowledge. They still did not researched real nature of bacterial and viral infection. They think that they are a collection of individual independent microorganisms. Modern medicine is wrong. Each infection is one species with separated in space parts. The same organization (kind of living) has bees, termites etc.
Absence of proper knowledge can be especially dangerous for now, because we expect a bacterial war. Why? Because antibiotics most likely won't work. A proper treatment - should be destruction of communication between bacteria or viruses. This measure destroys infection within 30 minutes. Most dangerous infection as dangerous as vulnerable if you know its weak place. I told it to New York Academy of Sciences, but they even do not want to try. People told me last time that New York Academy of Sciences supported development of science was about 20 years ago. Now it's mostly social club but not a club for supporting of science and scientists.

People can survive from many dangerous infections in certain circumstances. Genetic mutations is "smoke" (consequences of some process) but "fire" is different.
________________________

V.G.: > We still don't understand... we cannot have any imagination how to get to another galaxy...

Just as no one can design a radio tuner without knowledge of radio waves same as nobody can achieve a real space travel without any understanding of its nature.<

B.D.: But we have the potential to understand. Someone can tell us, or show us and we imitate the solution, reaping the benefits. Animals can't do that. We can also jump ahead a few steps, not millions of steps; time travel etc.

________________________

V.G.: With direction of existing technologies and direction of our thinking we rather will come to dead end than to the bright future. Too complicated issue to discuss it here. If you agree that everything in evolution has sense, please, explain, for what reason evolution created a human being if Earth can happily live without the mess we brought to our planet? Apparently, Earth does not need our pollutions, violence over nature etc.? And not for fun. What the necessity to have an intelligent life on our planet?
________________________

V.G.: > So, we are smart compared with animals but ... what is good in thinking ahead a few steps in a wrong direction?<

B.D.: What good is Natural Selection? Its more fallible, yet it works. We can do the Natural Selection in our heads before we make an action. On this board, you will see people testing each argument. When an argument is wrong, you drop it for a better one, but NoT M$ PR robot astroturfers. That is why you see the anti-monopoly arguments getting more virulent. M$ keeps using the same tired old arguments that have been tested and over prescribed; that don't work and never did. They can throw tuns of PR medicine: "We're not a monopoly! Linux is a Communist!" But we will just get more angry, and better at counter argument.

________________________

V.G.: It would be nice that our government would start to support own constitution without years of doubts. It would be making Natural Selection less painful.
________________________

V.G.: > Can we call a process of human self-annihilation as an example of superior mind?<

B.D.: It happened to the dinosaurs, yet life was not annihilated. If we are to die at our own hands, then that is our destiny. What is the point of a virus if it kills the host? If we are a virus to earth and not symbiotic, then we might die.

________________________

V.G.: We are the master of our fate. There is no bad or good destiny. We as anyone in the Universe have not more that we are deserved. Our destiny is changeable. If most people would see where Hitler went them - Hitler would lose his power, World War II was never happen. Now we badly need abilities to analyze flows of our destiny and knowledge how to change the fate. The problem is who will listen it?
________________________

V.G.: > Nature can live without human beings, but can we live without Nature?<

B.D.: What is Nature? A supernova? How would it be possible to get rid of nature? It would regenerate itself. If we kill nature and we die, then we are not fit to live.

________________________

V.G.: It's impossible to live without Nature. Above sentence was just for an abstract example. Severe damages to Nature will threaten to existence of humanity. At the beginning of this reply I wrote a point of view that if we will cause a global disaster - we will die, but soon we will be replaced with different species.
________________________

B.D.: In nature, there are no happy endings, but people have been tamed, domesticated into thinking that everything should be happy. Show a girl what they do to a cow before it goes into that hamburger and see her cringe.

V.G.: > I am surprised that many people are thinking that MS worries about software quality. In my opinion, MS worries about to take over the world and software is one of its instruments... <

B.D.: Yes. I think these people are just astroturfers hired by M$. I agree with what you say about M$. People revolt against Fascism, even in experiments. If that is virally, or through piracy, or through cracking activation, or slacking off at work if you have a fascist employer. They also get violent with each other however. Pacifism produced Chaos, and Democracy was the best model in experiments.

This also leads to a game of deception. M$ says we need Activation for piracy, when infact its just a way to surveillance and produce artificial scarcity of software, where you have to pay again and again. Then piracy goes up and they say "See! I told you."
Then they do something even more evil.

Only bill G could think that everyone is stealing from him and greedy, because he is.

V.G.: > "Americans are not Nazis, Microcrap is." The Russian mafia is not Russians, The Russian mafia is a multinational gang based in Russia. So the American people, who support MS are not the Americans, they are MS men/women (Nazis). Any time when mass of Nazis will overcome "a critical mass", the "chain reaction" of disaster will happen. <

B.D.: "We are all responsible." That sounds like bin ladin: "All americans pay taxes so they must all die. Not just the ones that stepped on holy land." The same thing that lead to Sep 11th.

________________________

V.G.: I had to say that people who supported Hitler were mostly Germans, but we called them fascists and Nazis. That people acted as they never were acted in a normal mind condition, in other words, they acted as completely different people, nation. Therefore, we can call then fascists instead of Germans (normal German has nothing common with a fascist). Is it a normal American, who is against freedom, free choice, equal rights etc.?
________________________

V.G.: > (... if I am speaking - I am doing what I am speaking). <

B.D.: What is that?

________________________

V.G.: For example, if I tell MS is a wrong direction - I do not use MS products voluntary. I am a phony rooster, if I scream MS is bad and at the same time I do not have a desire to switch to a different OS and products at my home (at least).
________________________

V.G.: > changed what would be better for people's minds?<

B.D.: That is hard to do, to tell people what is better for their minds.

Most people are stupid. We can afford to lose some gray matter and still survive. The smartest animal is dumber than the dumbest human. However, Thats when the animal instincts kick in. That's why stupid people multiply like animals and smart people wait till they can support their offspring before they have children. Abortion is good if you can't make a healthy child and can't even control your sexual negligence. But will they use it?

When we eliminate scarcity, we no longer need the desire to hord food and money.
Stupid people should never be left to their instincts un governed, or we have things like bill G, Hitler, and Sep 11 disaster.

M$ is going down the path of Philip Morris, Dupont, and the other parasitic companies that peoples life, safety, and freedom become subordinated to the propigation of a greed driven company that poisons society.

I see that M$ is pissing everyone off, and the people who love M$ are usually people who are getting paid to do so. If you look back a few months, you will see 96% of people are mad about Activation. Then you look now, and you see lots of stupid people who say the same things: "M$ should do what they want. You Commie!"

Where did all these PR robots come from in just a month or two? Their argument technique they use are flawed and deceptive because its astroturf:

"Ford uses their own engine. Should coke use a pepsi can? Let the market decide. No one is forcing you to do anything. If you don't like it, make your own OS! DirectX is not proprietary, Java is. You never owned your software, so we can revoke it whenever we please. Activation is unobtrusive. The customer wants this. We are protecting our copyright with exclusionary contracts."

All of this has also come out of the mouth of bill, allchin, and balmer. All of it is totally wrong, and yet, all of a sudden, people on every board, all over the net are saying it.
Government officials are being inundated with pro-M$ letters from dead people.

We need to form a coalition and protest in the streets because Most people are just not aware of technology, and you don't see much media coverage on TV about M$.
________________________

V.G.: Yes, we badly need to create a constructive coalition. In my opinion, we should not act with the emotions and claims - it won't work. Instead we need to prove it by our deeds
that support of MS is the same as to dig your own grave. If we won't buy MS products - MS won't exist. Indeed, if we will practically prove that non-MS products are not so bad as MS tries to brain wash us - the majority will switch to non-MS products (they are more reliable, more secure, have much cheaper price etc.). But, it should be done without any force to switch to non-MS platform. Any competition must be fair.
Remember: only freewill is a real force that can bring the difference in our being. For example, I never push anybody to buy non-MS products. I honestly told them about pluses and minuses of each product and left them to decide on their own what is better for them. Computers should be not the luxury, but necessity. Worldwide necessity should be inexpensive and easy affordable.
________________________

B.D.: This post is getting unwieldy.

________________________
V.G.: Do we have other choices?

Replies of Harry Roxberry:
ZDNet AnchorDesk Message Board.

AMEN!

one thing though: An animal does what it does because of nature. Understandable. We (humans)think we are above the animals of earth, yet we do everything to prove we are below them. Time to think.

always be just

Harry
___________________________________

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

That's what I am fighting for. I am afraid that in the future the history will write about us: "They were too weak to be animals and too stupid to be humans." Consciousness should be the main distinctive feature for humans. According to the laws of Nature the signs of consciousness are creations (not violence), signs of emotions are destructions of any conscious creations. More and more of us (humans) like to lose mind not only in the sex area (to mate as animals, instead of love as an intelligent species), but, unfortunately, in many vital areas including politics. I do not have too much believe that our consciousness will wake up before the next disaster. I am just trying to do what I can do and ask you to do the same. The best, if you can start to do it now, but later is better than never (if to lose too much is not an issue for us).

Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev
___________________________________

Reply to Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev:

What happens now is what was written two thousand years ago. Do you think that it can be changed? Do you think they care? All we can really do is our own best. I am saddened by man. I find myself at times wishing I were a "lesser animal". I, though can lift myself above the human garbage. And look to a future life.

always be just
___________________________________

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

It's time to think about:

Many years ago I so a TV show where a man closely associated to the top of Russian Power circles (he was wearing a mask), told us that 97-99% of Russian politicians first worry about their pockets, than about their country (mostly in cases, when somebody will pay them for it). We can make an assumption that people's nature are the same all around the world and, therefore, we should see about the same proportion between pocket-care and country-care politicians in any country on Earth? I don't have money to pay to politicians, but somebody can pay to almost every pocket-care politician on this planet. Somebody are too bored from having everything, now he only wants to get a thing that nobody have had before: to be the one emperor of the one empire with the one empire language. For what? For vanity. Has he the necessary system to resolve common problems? No, he has not. The result? The disaster as it never happen before.
So, no one without money can get influence on politicians, those who have money do not have a desire to open our eyes on what they are doing. Dead end? Should we be eliminated because some politicians rather die than will do good things for free?
A solution could be that non-money people (majority) will change their mind and will stop to support vanity of their politicians and power leaders. It requires to spread information that reveals things as they are, and peaceful real solutions for the problems. Who will allow to do it? I guess nobody. Even a pretty good amount of archives of World War II (England, the USA etc.) are still secret. Imagine how dirty they are. Who wants the truth? Nobody. Again the dead end.
Any solutions?
___________________________________

Reply to Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev:

What I see is man following the cardinal sins of mankind. Greed has been the fuel for fire since the creation. It has been proven time and time again that if a person has enough riches, he can do anything his little heart pleases. This has become more evident as time passes. Will we ever find a plan, a method, anything that will not fall prey to greed or any other sin? NO! The only way to have our world run properly is to NOT let man do it. Like that will ever happen. What I have seen lately is the acceptance of the most horrific sins imaginable. Politics is not about running things, government, it's about money and power. Our country tauts it's messages of freedom but who is free? Are you free to say what you want? Truly free? Just try telling the world the truths about our government or any one that has some money. You will be eliminated before you get your first word out. And yet, They tell us we are free. RIGHT! We could box all the politicians, send them to the moon. Then what? Those who take over will do the same thing. Maybe not at first, but it will be the same. This world is doing everything it is supposed to. Man is living just as he was made. The only thing we can truly do is pray the next time man is made right.

My opinion of man is clearly evident. Man is the lowest, most evil creature ever devised. I am man. I am not perfect. Maybe in my next life I can be better. Maybe I can be an animal.

Until then, I will try to not give in to the sins that are borne to me.

Mr. Vladimir Gouliaev, Thanks for being a friend and sharing.

Harry
___________________________________

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

Harry, I thank you too. It's amazing: you are the only one who replies to me here. You see, how many people are concerned about tomorrow, so tomorrow, it seems, still has no choice. Too many people think that the money is the first priority of their life. Even in the front of the possible future global disaster they ignore it. People do not understand that being in collaboration with each other is what evolution needs from us, and this human quality is more valuable than making money by itself. What are the value and sense of your money tomorrow, if you will be dead? Think: it does not matter if you believe me, understand or don't understand me - if we want things that in opposite to the laws of evolution - we (humanity) will set up a situation that will prove us - money cannot be our first concern. Evolution does not care about our money, gold and other "valuable" things. Evolution cares about our mind. If evolution gave us consciousness - it gave it for certain purpose. It does not mater if we can understand this purpose or not. We only need to understand that receiving of the gift (consciousness) obligates us to develop it. Consciousness has ability to control wild emotions, aggression, such as events of September 11, etc. (it's a long story of scientific explanation). Money, love, relationships, business and so on are needed to be considered just as tools that can help to develop our mental abilities or destroy them (us). For example, you can choose money as the measurement of applying your skills, but never as a purpose of your life. Happiness does not depend from amount of money. Even poor people are able to feel better than a millionaire.

What I know for sure (sure is for me) that the only choice of humanity is to start as soon as possible to develop abilities to control wild emotions and aggression. Plus, we need immediately cease the information that increases the level of our wild emotions (at least senseless horror, porno films, information about violence, etc.). We can change the world for better only, if we will change our mind first. Governments should do this. Will they do it?

"The way going down is much easier than going up." (Diogenes). In other words, to follow emotions (do not think at all, to be as an animal) is much easier than to think conscientiously (to be a human).

I hope that this letter will awake somebody to think differently, because we are the last hope.

___________________________________

Reply to Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev:

What can I do? How could I be of any help? One person can't change the world. It's not my concern. DOES ANY OF THIS SOUND FAMILIAR? If it does, you're wrong. Why? If there is somebody else listening, tell a friend. Tell the friend to tell a friend. Guess what the result can be in just a short time. We, as the people of this great planet, can make the difference. One as one, nothing, one as all, anything. Can we get together. Or does no one else care. Are we one of the few that see the possibility for a better future? What we can do is talk. Spread the ideas, Think, Logically, completely, thoroughly. What is needed is for the peoples of this world to unite against the stupidity of those affected with greed and power. We need to be doing what is best for the people of our world. Not for the wealth of the few in power.

always be just
___________________________________

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

Step by step.

1.) There are many facts from real life that ability to control emotions (consciousness) is more powerful than desire to attack (violent emotions). Take any of the cases: somebody is face to face with a huge wild predator (white shark, lion etc.). If that person will control own fear =wild emotions - the person can remotely to control wild emotions (to kill) of the predator=can control the predator itself. The result - no attack, both sides are OK, the predator will continue to do what it should do as an animal (to regulate balance of animals in nature), the human can continue to do things that only humans can do. In all those cases fate of humans depended on themselves only. If they act as human being should act (with consciousness) - animals are unable to touch them, if they act as animals (uncontrolled emotions) - their fate will lower down to the fate of animals in the same situation. I can write a long chain of arguments if it is necessary, to explain the conclusion: we need to admit that no one will help us except us. Or, you have consciousness and you can resolve a situation as a human without violence, or you are as an animal and will destroy or will be destroyed.

2.) Read item 1. again and apply it to human society. Some monkeys figure out how to walk on two legs, to say a couple hundred words in a human language and find out how to use weapons, so they decided that they are humans. But, they are the same monkeys, because they follow the same logic as animals: to destroy anyone as soon as you see its weaknesses. They are strong and dangerous until opposite side is playing in their animal games. But, monkeys will fail as soon as the opposite side will understand what reaction should be on mass violence of animals against humans and apply this knowledge in human deeds. Consciousness can remotely control subconsciousness, if humans will apply their consciousness according to the laws of evolution (Nature, Universe). People/country can change their fate if they can achieve certain "critical mass" - amount of people with necessary understanding of reasons of appearing of people/country problems and knowledge how to resolve them. In reality, consciousness is a greater power than we think, the problem is that people still don't understand it, therefore, do not use it as they should use. Consciousness that I am talking about is not only social power. My definition of consciousness: consciousness is ABILITY TO MANAGE information (in psychological and in physical objects). This ABILITY is not God, mystery and so on, this is like a certain order of new (for us) laws of physic's and it can be transferred to mathematical formulas as a pure mathematical system.

3.) Conclusion: if we will create a "friend to friend" chain reaction and will get the "critical mass" of people with the same basic understanding (consciousness) - real social and physical changes (real life improvements) will immediately occur no matter how powerful is the negative opposition. You can check this theory on your own experience, history facts or in your practice. This proposal does not require belief, it requires action because of understanding.

At least we can spread ideas and exchange opinions for better understanding of what we have and what need to be done. In my opinion, now is a situation where the question: 'Do you love your country?' need to be exchange with 'Do you love to live on Earth?'

___________________________________

Reply to Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev:

Freedom
Let's talk about freedom. We all think we have it. Do we?
There is only one true freedom I can se that we all have; choice. We use/abuse this everyday, every moment. The one thing we all have is our god given right to freedom of choice. But so many go through life making the wrong choices. Never looking at the whole picture. Never seeing the effects of their actions. Never caring to look beyond their own simple wants. Doesn't anybody think it is about time to do the right thing, Think before you act. If you choose to tease a dog what will be the reaction? Most likely you will be bitten. Why does the dog bite? Nature. It does not think such as we do. Freedom of choice for the animal is limited to it's own nature. It can't be faulted for doing this.
Reverse the situation. What do you do if a dog is teasing you? You could attack the dog, bite it. But most likely you will end up bitten in the struggle. And after all this, who is the victor? Neither. The victor is always the one who thinks before acting. Who chooses the best way to act upon a situation will always come out on top.

Violence is a reaction.

Act or React.
Who understands the difference between them. A reaction is simple. A car is speeding towards you, you jump/run out of it's way. That is reaction. Necessary and good for some instances, but not all. A reaction requires no thought at all. But this can be bad also. If I came up to you and hit you, I will ready for your reaction. I will be counting on it. Therefore I will have the upper hand. You will be playing into my plan. I will have control. All because you reacted. Now would be the time to stop and think, then ACT. After given proper thought you will have deduced the situation and all options. Now you see many choices, run, fight back, but with more control on your side, You may find a weak spot in me. Maybe you could call the police. Or just do nothing. But by thinking and acting you will stand the best chance of making the right choice.

always be just
This is a motto I have found to be very useful and worthwhile. If we are sure that everything we do in life is a just action, how can we be wrong? Yes, it is possible to make mistakes, but at least you will have made an honest and forgivable mistake. It sounds simple but is very complex also. I have found that by living this motto I have come further than I ever did before. I use this wisely. I think about things that are relevant to the given situation, consider all aspects of all the possible actions I could take, I then choose what I believe is the best action, the just action. More. If you go through life doing the right things, making the right choices, being just, why would anyone ever have reason to treat you in an unjust manner? As said before, we will make
mistakes. Lord knows, I have made my share and probably a few others shares. But by thinking, acting, being just, we can only do better than ever before.

Love

Love is another gift we have been given. We all have this ability to love but we seldom use it. We reserve it for just a few people that are closest to us. Why not share it with one and all? We will not run out of love. We can only find that the gift of love will breed more love. The best way to be loved is to love. Love is the greatest cure for all things. Love can cure this world. Love will ease a broken heart. Love will make the pain feel better. Love will.

Race
Hello! Why are so many people going around laying some silly group name on these people or them? Our governments are famous for this. They say I am part of the white race/ caucasian. They are wrong. This is only an insignificant term to lump me into a group of certain people that have something of the same outward appearance. They are wrong. There is only one race; THE HUMAN RACE. We all belong. We all look the dame when it comes down to it. The few outwardly visible differences are only signs of heritage. And even that is superficial at best. I am not saying don't be proud of who you are, of your heritage, of your bloodline. We should recognize though that man started with two in the beginning, which was the creation of god. We all can trace our heritage back to them. We are all the same. Once we all accept this we can find everything is better. Once we see a person for what they are, an individual, we will find each and every person on this earth are so uniquely beautiful, and still the same as we are.

To wrap up, let me say one thing; I Love You.

Harry

___________________________________

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

Yes, we have only one thing for free: free choice - the rest is not for free. But look at 'free choice' more deeply. Yes, everyone can meet a person who will hurt him/her. Yes, no one has protection, nor God, nor Evil, nor alien from a car accident or plane crush, or any other trouble. Yes, everything could happen, but if it will happen, will it be just an accident?

In Russia I published an article: "Why cows butt townspeople or how to avoid to be a victim of a criminal". This article explains reasons of common kinds of violence and protection from it without weapons, hand/legs fighting, hypnotic abilities etc., just mind work, plus this article gives explanation what government need to do to diminish of crime level using laws of human psychic.
I claim that nothing happens without reason, nothing is an accident. We are within a giant system of unshakable laws that sort and regulate everything. We are like in a situation: there is a computer with software (life) and there is an input information (people), information (people) can be different and process of this information (people) also can be different, but the software (laws of life) is always the same. Our shortages are a moving force of our fate. We are constantly put by those software (laws) into circumstances, which force us to debug input information (to understand reasons of our failure/shortages). If created circumstances (trouble) do not help us to resolve the problem (did not stimulate our brain) that is appeared due to our misunderstanding of 'the software algorithm' (laws of life) - we are forced to go to the next level of explanation. It means that we are put into harder circumstances (more trouble). This process never stops, until we clearly will understand 'the software algorithm' (laws of life). For example, a person says that all people are sisters and brothers and we should love each other. It seems, nothing wrong about. It's true that we are all humanity. It's true that normally we should live without intentional harm to each other. The problem is that the majority of us (humanity) are not ready for this understanding, because they do not have a necessary base in their consciousness. It means, they are unable to understand what the person are talking about. What people usually do when they are receiving too complicated for understanding information and do not like it? They try to escape from it (sleeping, going away etc.), because brain requires a lot of vital energy for this process. Here, we see how completely truthful information turns into violence. Physical violence appears when this true information reaches a low energy of a man/woman. They do not have a reserve of vital energy to pay for receiving of information that cannot be processed in their brains properly. It causes decreasing of the level of vital energy to dangerous zone, where body won't have normal functions. This effect is drastically decreasing level of their consciousness and temporarily turning the man/woman into animals. Then the man/woman start to act the same as animals and do what animals do when they are under attack. In real life it looks as if a person came with peace and wants to bring peace to everybody, because to live in peace is better than to live in hatred. At the beginning, a peacemaker meets resistance because most people already hate somebody and cannot understand any solutions except death of imaginary enemies. If the peacemaker did not stop his peaceful actions - people will try to get rid of him. If this measure does not work - the peacemaker would be killed. Death of the peacemaker may look as an occasional accident, but should we think so?

It's not enough to bring a good idea to people, most difficult thing is to sow this idea and to grow it. If you will succeed - anyone can crop your harvest with pleasure.

In Russia I sent to a higher authority an article about necessity to correlate child education with laws of human evolution. In 5 years they decided that this article was good for practical use. I guess, it will take a few more decades, when they will start to apply offered approach to child education. A proposal how to decrease the level of crime without spending money for police reinforcement still too complicated for their understanding. In the USA I proposed to change ridicules situation: every year in the USA billion dollars are spending for nothing. To save those money - the USA need improvement in the existing system with a little investment and than could invest saved money to necessary projects, that can bring additional profit. Nobody will lose a job, all business and government structure will be the same except the system. Or, I wrote it too complicated for a couple of congressmen who saw this concise description called Reform Tree-in-One <http://www.tupbiosystems.com/3-in-1/3-in-1.htm>, or without my money they can do nothing, or the USA is too rich to worry about wasting of billions of dollars every year, or power people are too conservative - but nobody went beyond dead point. Conclusion: do not ask politicians to do good things, instead ask people, do they need to live better, because people choose politicians (usually).

We have to clarify word 'LOVE'. I am not against love, but, in my opinion, we incorrectly use one word 'LOVE' for completely different processes. I divided 'LOVE' in 3 main types. For example, can we call a process of becoming of an insane and process of getting of inspiration as the same process - 'LOVE'? We need to say whether we are talking about 'LOVE' - we are talking about bringing us up. We need to admit that even cruelest killers are often falling in love with a kind of God. If you are a good person - you don't need to say 'I am a good person', you just do the right things and only than others may judge you: are you good or not.

Reply to Harry Roxberry:

Hi Harry,

I wish that the USA would have more people like you.

I am a medical doctor licenced in Russia. My main interest is learning the real laws of our existence and applying them to a practical usage (medical, social, political, personal etc.). If you are interested - I can tell you more. This is not a questionable philosophy - this is a global system based on mathematics. For example, by using this system my clients can predict (a simple mathematical counting) events in their personal life, like how their date will be today, whom they will meet, what will happen if ..., etc. and nobody can change predicted fate, no matter how many efforts they will try to do (because it's based on unshakable law): if initial data had not been changed - the final result won't change (intermediate steps can be various). Of course, I can use this theory to make deep predictions of future and to say what really happened in the past. But, this knowledge still is too complicated to adapt for power people. In 1984 I mathematically substantiated that the USSR will be destroyed and why. So what? Who used it? In 1984 I also knew (mathematically) what will happen with the USA and why and when (I was mistaken in a half of a year in precise date of the starting events of Sep. 11). In my articles predictions about the USA were deleted. It seems, that I am here to accomplish my scientific job without any practical application of this knowledge. What I tried - nobody listens, I simplified it as much as I can - no results anyway. Now, I see only one way to change the USA fate - to spread the simplified ideas to people. Therefore, I wrote, "The Americans - look in the mirror, if you can."

I said that fighting with the consequences (that's what the USA is doing now) is a wrong approach. They should resolve the reasons of troubles first. Do they know the reasons?

Let's start from the simple issues.
I guess, it is not too complicated issue for the government to analyze the facts of Sep. 11 as a system. Look by yourself:

People, who organized this act should be very smart, to have an excellent knowledge about the USA, plus should have access to the special information about the US defence system, etc.

This action could be done only by extremely rich person who has an excellent knowledge of the USA (according to my theory this idea cannot be initialized by any government by itself). Guess, where is the best place to get this knowledge?

This person must have the biggest financial power in the world to cover up all money transaction due to the expected stock market changes (no one grows money on trees). How many world-class billionaires in the World can do it? (with covering up all their computer and paper transactions)

There is only one logical reason is illegally to change money balance of the World - to take over the world THROUGH MONEY (of course, not because they do not have enough money to buy the best car, house, an island etc.). Psychologically, after certain level, money and things are not a pleasure, power is the pleasure. The more power the more pleasure. Power is like a strongest narcotic for them. Power-addiction is the worst condition for "treatment".

The terrorists need to be the stupidest men in the World to leave flight manual and Koran in the stolen car, which travelled from Canada to the USA. But, this fact is incompatible with the level of intelligence of organization of this action. Stupid people cannot organize World Trade Center bombing. Can Arab terrorists work against themselves?

A passport of a terrorist was found on the first floor of the World Trade Center. They cannot find the bodies, but the passport they found. Can the passport survived in this catastrophe? For what reason Arab terrorists should put their passport there? There is no reason.

Conclusion: somebody outsmarted Bin Laden. The person who did it most badly wants to take over the world THROUGH MONEY, must have an excellent knowledge about the USA, must be very smart, must have real influence on all worldwide financial centers (at least through computers), must fully set up a false victim. Guess, who is he?

The question is the USA government was fooled or need to be looked as a fooled?
Should the USA spent money to bomb Afghanistan or needed to find a better solutions? Somebody, who stands behind terrorists, will continue its job and will force the USA to look forever for guilty (in World Trade Center bombing) people in a wrong place. Please, count how much will it cost.

But anyway, first we need to look for reasons of existence of such situation, second - for guilty people. Will we look for it?

Due to a few reasons I did not say about what I think the USA government need to do. I will say it only to people who can do it. This information should not be spreaded.

1.) P.S. May be Bill Gates won't do what he is doing, if he will know for 100% the final result of his desires (the end will be the same as with Hitler) with a combination of situation, where most people will understand the same. Will we have the majority, before it's too late?

2.) P.S. (did you see movies "Swordfish" and "Antitrust"?)

Micro-Nazis - people who supports loss of freedom of everyone in favor of the one. They cannot see or hear other solutions, because all of them are blind and deaf. But that poor guys can talk and write. Forgive them, they cannot understand what they are doing.

Some of my replies (on forums, the article - "Who stands behind the terrorists?"):

People, I told you that this is just a short chain of facts. Analysis of all the facts is too long and very complicated to write about here, but it makes a very clear picture. Somebody may think that I am crazy, but they should think thoroughly before making any claims.

I need to refresh the memory of people about the situation that happened before World War II. Four years before the start of World War II, Stalin had a copy of a plan, signed by Hitler, about the details and the time of a blitz-war with the USSR. This information was confirmed by the best agents of the country. What happened?  Stalin did not believe it. In his mind Hitler was a "good guy" and, therefore, would not attack the USSR. This ignorance cost the USSR and the world hundreds millions of lives plus huge destructions in USSR and Europe. If due to the our ignorance we will not see the beginning of World War III now - we may have to face the total annihilation of humanity a little bit later.

Of course, anyone has the rights to think that nowadays no one has desire to conquer the World because humanity is too good now and if Bill Gates wants to enslave the computer world - he never will  go further (to the political world) and will be satisfied with one platform (MS Windows), one software (MS), one computer language (MS). If you think so - you will never help to change our fate. If the amount of rationally thinking people will not overcome the quantity of ignorant, inert people - we will not escape a situation where everyone will clearly understand who is right now and who is wrong.

What we can do is activation of friend-to-friend chain reaction to get the "critical mass" of people who need to prevent the possible threat of World War III.  Remember whom you are dealing with now to determine what direction will our history (future) may take. If people would not support Hitler - World War II would never have happened. If we won't support Hitler II (at least won't buy his products voluntary) - we will not have World War III (it looks like without our strong opinion governments will rather accelerate a possible disaster than do real preventions).

I understand, if a complexity of an issue exceeds brains' abilities to handle it - the person does not accept the information no matter whether it is or is not true. In the Middle Ages, people who spoke the truth beyond the common knowledge were considered as 'too foolish to live' and ... were burned. Thanks to science, that time, it seems to have gone to the past. Complexity - that is what people are mostly afraid of. Even word 'DEVIL' is translated as 'KNOWLEDGEABLE'. Therefore, I am trying to say it as simple as I can. But this is not always helping.

"The way going down is much easier than going up." (Diogenes). In other words, to follow animal instincts (do not think at all, to destroy everything what you can destroy) is much easier than to think conscientiously (to be creative).

My proposal:
if somebody wants to claim that something is bad - the person should offer a better proposal (be creative). If the person cannot offer a better (in his/her opinion) solution - please, say nothing. Why? Because there is no thing that cannot be improved. But why we should deny a good thing if we currently do not have a better one. Of course, this thing is not perfect, but it does not mean that this is bad if other solutions are worse.