Who
stands behind the terrorists?
Let's start from
the simple issues.
I guess, it is not too complicated for the government to analyze the
facts of Sep. 11 as a system. Look for yourself:
The people, who organized this act should be very smart - to have an excellent
knowledge about the USA, plus access to the special information about
the US defense systems and etc.
This action could be done only by an extremely rich person who has excellent
knowledge of the USA (according to my theory this idea cannot be initialized
by any government alone). Guess where is the best place to get this
knowledge?
This person must have the biggest financial power in the world to
cover up all the money transactions due to the expected stock market changes
(no one grows money on trees). How many world-class billionaires in the
World can do it?
There is only one logical reason to change the
money balance of the World illegally - to take over the world THROUGH
MONEY (of course, not because they do not have enough money to buy
the best car, house, an island etc.). Psychologically, after a certain
level, money and things are not a pleasure, power is the pleasure. The
more power, the more pleasure. Power is the strongest narcotic for them.
Power-addiction is the hardest addiction to break. How many people do
you know who are trying to conquer the World? Which one of
them is trying the hardest and already achieved the most? I believe
there is only one worthy candidate for this position.
The terrorists need
to be the stupidest men in the World to leave a flight manual and a Koran
in a stolen car, which traveled from Canada to the USA. This fact is incompatible
with the level of intelligence it took to organize this action. Stupid people
cannot organize the World Trade Center bombing. Can Arab terrorists work
against themselves?
A passport of a terrorist was found on the first floor of the World Trade
Center. They cannot find the bodies, but the passport they found. Can the
passport survive in this catastrophe? For what reason would Arab terrorists
leave their passport there? There is no logical reason.
Conclusion: somebody outsmarted Bin Laden. The person who did it
most badly wants to take over the world THROUGH MONEY. He must
have excellent knowledge about the USA, must be very smart, must have
real influence on all worldwide financial centers (at least through computers),
must fully set up a false victim. Guess, who is he?
The question is that the USA government was fooled or needs
to be looked at as a fool?
Should the USA spent money to bomb Afghanistan or does it need to find a
better solution? Somebody, who stands behind terrorists, will continue his
job and will force the USA to look forever for the guilty (in the World
Trade Center disaster) people in a wrong place. Please, count how much will
it cost.
But anyway, first we need to look for reasons of existence of such situation,
second for the guilty party. Will we look for it?
Due to a few reasons I did not say what I think the USA government needs
to do. I will say it only to the people who can do it. This information
should not be spread.
Fighting the consequences (that's what the USA is doing now) is a wrong
approach. They should resolve the reasons for their troubles first. Do they
know the reasons?
P.S.
- May be Bill Gates
won't do what he is doing, if he will know for 100% the final outcome
of his desires (the end will be the same as with Hitler) with a combination
of situations where most people will understand the same. Will
we have the majority, before it's too late?
- Did you know that
the spreading in the USA Anthrax was created in the US military lab
(according to the genetic tests)? Does it seem a little strange that
the offices at Microsoft received a letter with Anthrax and nobody was
infected? Why would the terrorists use Anthrax which did not have the
necessary contaminating power? May be somebody has to sacrifice just
a hundred Americans with a purpose to get the public in a total panic
which will help him to make hundreds of billions of dollars? This person
will not use highly contaminating bacterial infection (weapon) because
it could kill a majority of pretty rich people and, therefore, it can
kill his hundred billion dollar market (dead people cannot buy goods).
If this theory is correct, it means that somebody KNEW
FOR SURE BEFORE THE BOMBING of the World Trade Center
what was supposed to happen, and that ARAB
TERRORISTS DID NOT HAVE the necessary bacterial and chemical
weapons in the USA, did not plan to start a big war and are not ready
to strike back (for now). But they will certainly start to do everything
they have been accused of now (it depends on the actions of G.W. Bush).
I guess, in one year the opposition will get the necessary amount of
bio and chemo-weapons to destroy all humanity and will figure out how
to use it effectively. This kind of development should be predicted
by the man who organized this scenario. It means that somebody, (not
a government) has access to the top secrets of Arabs (Arabs use MS computers),
that they knew that Arab terrorists are not prepared to fight back,
had to be sure that in the future he will also know what they will plan
to do and would use this situation to collect the world's money and
to gain power.
- I wouldn't be
surprised if Osama bin Laden is on the payroll of the man who organized
the events of September 11th (Osama bin Laden is a Saudi who has worked
with the CIA since the 1980s, when they supplied him with U.S.-made
Stinger missiles so his forces could shoot down Russian helicopters
in Afghanistan). In this case he is the best anti-America agent whom
all Arab terrorists will trust with all their secrets without hesitation
(read
an indirect evidence). If it sounds crazy, then please
explain to me why the US military lost time and did nothing when they
knew the exact location of Osama bin Laden (Sep. 11) and started looking
for him only when he was hidden? ... and why Arab terrorists intentionally
gave up information against them? Did Afghanis badly wanted to be bombed
but were shy to say so directly? Did
the Taliban want to loose their power in Afghanistan? They could
not have any doubts about their future if they agreed to be guilty in
events of Sep. 11.
- In my opinion
the events of September 11th were organized because of money. I have
reasons/facts
to think that September 11th is a part of the biggest worldwide
money laundry operation that ever happened. Imagine that you have a
lot of money. What would you do with stocks, oil, pharmaceutical companies
etc. if you would know for sure what would happen September 11th and
after September 11th (Anthrax letters, etc.)? Even if you are not a
genius - you could make hundreds or thousands of billions of dollars,
plus the most valuable thing - you will get more power over more people
(power is the biggest narcotic). Thus, September 11th is the best opportunity
for the man who is unhappy because he can get everything except the
only one pleasure in the world - to have power over the whole World.
You know that for
money even a government can sell their own country because they
are just a people (according to the human history - world's politicians
and money cannot be separated in deeds. But politicians are the greatest
masters of their favorite "magic show": how their "true
link" established with people's needs before their election mysteriously
turns after their election into the true link with money without people's
needs. For many centuries people still cannot understand how they do
this and still pay money or their lives to see "exciting magic
shows" until the end of their favorite politicians). I also do
not understand why so many people believe that a "magician"
(politician) indeed can materialize a "rabbit" (fulfill his/her
promises) from an "empty hat" (without having a necessary
base)?
How many politicians do you know who did what they promised? Why do
many of us want to believe in an average, living life of easy but extremely
foxy liars and do not believe honest smart hard workers? Because nobody
loves the truth?
- Can you guess
what is the best reason/excuse for government to violate the fundamental
law (antitrust) of the USA and cause DIRECT
DAMAGE TO THE WEALTH OF AMERICA?
(Where was the USA economy going before September 11th?)
What disaster can
cover up the disappearance of the antitrust case (MS) if the USA constitution
requires the break up of Microsoft? Does it seem that we are watching
a soap opera called "Antitrust" where we, the viewers, don't
know the end written a long time ago? Authors just do not want to destroy
a fairy tale about good judges, congressmen and the stability of great
laws of the country until the end. Good money can buy not only third/second
world government (for instance, Brazil changed their final decision
to go with Linux after Bill Gates' visit to Brazil politicians. He convinced
them to stay with MS because they did not know how good it is for Brazil
to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to MS, instead of a wise investment
of that money in Brazil's economy. For your information: Florida City
Hall (see ZDNet archives), uses only Linux and they are OK. I guess,
Brazil also would be OK with Linux). Good money can buy good scenarios
as well. Powerful people think that they deserve to play Russian roulette
with the World - will their fictions destroy the real World or just
miss. Every time each big writer of a big fiction puts his bullets closer
to the target - heart of the World (each war for worldwide domination
is much more destructive than the previous one). Now one man with the
old crazy idea of taking over the world is going to put us into World
War III. The tragedy is that now it was so professionally orchestrated
that most people won't see it happening. For example, the military forces
of the most big countries use MS software, so the question for hackers
is - can the USA, Russia and Europe bomb themselves using their rockets
without their governments' authorization or be completely paralyzed
for a certain period of time because somebody entered the necessary
code in the operating system that allows them to get full
access to it? (I simplified the procedure). Does this code exist? If
we can prove it - we definitely will know who is hiding behind the mask.
The man who knows this code and has money and power can control/blackmail
the World (including the USA).
- This is a short
chain of facts. If we will take all the facts - the picture will be
more obvious.
Micro-Nazis - people
who supports loss of freedom of everyone in favor of the one. They cannot
see or hear other solutions, because all of them are blind and deaf. But
those poor guys can talk and write. Forgive them if they cannot understand
what they are doing. (an
analogy from history: How IBM helped the Nazis)
For more information why it happened, what can happen and a clue of what
should be done (according to the special scientific research) visit:
http://www.tupbiosystems.com/articles/sep_11.html
Some
of my replies (on forums, the article - "Who stands behind the
terrorists?"):
People,
I told you that this is just a short chain of facts. Analysis of all the
facts is too long and very complicated to write about here, but it
makes a very clear picture. Somebody may think that I am crazy, but they
should think thoroughly before making any claims.
I need to refresh the memory of people about the situation that
happened before World War II. Four years before the start of World
War II, Stalin had a copy of a plan, signed by Hitler, about the details
and the time of a blitz-war with the USSR. This information
was confirmed by the best agents of the country. What happened? Stalin
did not believe it. In his mind Hitler was a "good guy"
and, therefore, would not attack the USSR. This ignorance cost the
USSR and the world hundreds millions of lives plus huge destructions
in USSR and Europe. If due to the our ignorance we will not see the
beginning of World War III now - we may have to face the
total annihilation of humanity a little bit later.
Of
course, anyone has the rights to think that nowadays no one has desire
to conquer the World because humanity is too good now and if Bill Gates
wants to enslave the computer world - he never will not go further
(to the political world) and will be satisfied with one platform
(MS Windows), one software (MS), one computer language (MS). If you think
so - you will never help to change our fate. If the amount of rationally thinking
people will not overcome the quantity of ignorant, inept people
- we will not escape a situation where everyone will clearly understand
who is right now and who is wrong.
What
we can do is activation of friend-to-friend chain reaction to get the "critical
mass" of people who need to prevent the possible threat
of World War III. Remember whom you are dealing with
now to determine what direction will our history (future) may
take. If people would not support Hitler - World War II would never have
happened. If we won't support Hitler II (at least won't buy his products
voluntary) - we will not have World War III (it looks like without
our strong opinion governments will rather accelerate a possible disaster
than do real preventions).
I
understand, if a complexity of an issue exceeds brains' abilities to handle
it - the person does not accept the information no matter whether it is
or is not true. In the Middle Ages, people who spoke the truth beyond
the common knowledge were considered as 'too foolish to live' and ...
were burned. Thanks to science, that time, it seems to have gone to the
past. Complexity - that is what people are mostly afraid of. Even word
'DEVIL' is translated as 'KNOWLEDGEABLE'. Therefore, I am trying to say
it as simple as I can. But this is not always helping.
"The
way going down is much easier than going up." (Diogenes). In other
words, to follow animal instincts (do not think at all, to destroy everything
what you can destroy) is much easier than to think conscientiously (to
be creative).
My
proposal:
if somebody wants to claim that something is bad
- the person should offer a better proposal (be creative). If the person
cannot offer a better (in his/her opinion) solution - please, say nothing.
Why? Because there is no thing that cannot be improved. But why we should
deny a good thing if we currently do not have a better one. Of course,
this thing is not perfect, but it does not mean that this is bad if other
solutions are worse.
|
