• Reform Three-in-One
• Please, count and think:
• Introduction
• From the history of the new reform

• Concise description of the reform THREE-IN-ONE
• Prerequisite for Reform Three-in-One
• What should be done
• Home

a. It is necessary to simplify the process of approbation for medications, which undergo an approval process similar to the American standards in other countries and are successfully used by those countries for many years. This measure, by itself, will cut down expenses for approval from millions to thousands of dollars.

b. Patients for whom those medications are effective, and legally permitted, can benefit from it during their lifetime.

c. To give permission to doctors (specifically M.D's.) the right to use, as main or auxiliary, medications which are known as nontoxic, but still don't have FDA approval, with the patients' consent. To create and establish new laws permitting the use of unapproved nontoxic medications in the USA as official approbation under special circumstances. This will allow the government to get the effect of "collective approbation" when the results of medical practice of doctors from different clinics are united for legal approval of medications by a new system of the FDA without additional government spending.

d. To establish an International or a World Organization similar to the FDA and combine it with the International Currency Fund, for the cases requiring huge investments for the testing of new medications or methods of treatment. This financial burden could be divided between a few countries or all countries of the world. Those countries would have joint permission to utilize the results of such collaboration.

e. To create a law or to add to the Constitution the right of each citizen of the USA to get any necessary treatment which may restore health, and to choose any doctor who is able to correctly apply this method of treatment under supervision of proposed new health system (Reform Three-in-One).

f. As "a first corner stone in the foundation" of a new reform to make New York City/State a "Free Medical Zone," in which a doctor will have the legal right to prescribe any necessary medications to patients. This measure will increase the flow of capital to New York and will delete the necessity of obtaining treatment in Mexico or other countries, spending thousands of dollars, when the same remedies will become available in American (New York City's) clinics under the supervision of qualified doctors for the same or less money. Additionally, this measure will attract (to New York City) the best doctors, not only from the USA, but from all over the World! When given the legal chance to use natural or other nontoxic methods of treatment, they will probably be able to cure any disease. New York City can become famous as the medical capital of the world for treatment of all diseases. It seems that this inexpensive measure would become quite a strong magnet for many Americans and foreigners and will yield huge financial returns. By comparison with other means of attracting capital to our City/State it will also bring innumerable health benefits for everybody.

g. Upon the official request from American medical clinics, medical doctors from other countries, specializing in methods of treatment not used in the USA, should get automatic legal permission for medical practice in USA, using this method of treatment. It is not practical and doesn't make much sense to force an M.D. from another country to spend at least a few years to get legal permission to treat patients with the method he brought from his motherland to teach American doctors. The medical establishment which invites such a foreign colleague to this country should assume the responsibility for providing the translation services, the adequate insurance policy, etc. This measure can improve the level of common health care in the USA.

h. To achieve changes in obsolete FDA laws which limit doctors in the selection of means and methods of treatment, and by implementing those changes on the level of government.

i. To obligate the insurance companies to cover and compensate such new innovations and approved means and methods of treatment. This measure will help to dilute hostility towards new innovations from major pharmaceutical companies, because of their possession of the most current technological advances and ability to invest huge sums of money in their development. Such companies could quickly reorganize for the production of new (nontoxic) substances, which will be covered by insurance.

For example, an article published in Future Cures magazine in the November issue of 1997 (page 4), says the following: "Heart disease alone has become a $50 billion-a-year industry. Prescription drugs are a $38 billion business". Pharmaceutical companies can not make money from non-FDA approved medications. You do not have to be the smartest man in the world to suppose that pharmaceutical companies and the FDA are inseparable friends, which inspire deadly fear in all manufacturers producing non-FDA approved products.

   Return to the main page

With this "the best" law (probably, taken directly from Dark Stalin's time) the FDA has rights to put in jail or out of business any manufacturer, if the FDA thinks that thoughts could arrear in the imagination of some nonexistent consumers. In order to avoid national anger, the FDA does not hurt each manufacturer of natural products; the FDA tortures only those who manufacture really working remedies. Why? Because those natural remedies work faster and better than drugs. And so? The FDA is thinking, if the people will prefer safe natural remedies to toxic drugs - who will continue to waist their own money to buy some kind of a poison from pharmaceutical companies? Well, the FDA puts all their effort to "play the best music" for those who order it and don't care about those who are "listening."

If we will continue just to watch the FDA's actions quietly - a next generation of the FDA would rather sue Mother Nature itself for its recommendation to use for animal's treatment the natural remedies only, because it will very much confuse domestic pets, which use only pharmaceutical drugs plus the FDA approved food and therefore live 10-15 years less than the same wild animals. The FDA believes that domestic pets as well as a human beings should not know about the better treatment available (natural) and food.

It would be rather good to shift the FDA priority from fattening the wallets of pharmaceutical companies to the health care of Americans.

Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Herbert Ley completely agrees with this: "The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day." But if a new law will give medical freedom, then pharmaceutical companies will be able to make money from currently non approved products. What sense would it make to resist a natural drug industry?

When the New Reform comes alive, people from all over the world will see a miracle as pharmaceutical companies turn America into a world leader of Natural Pharmaceuticals, as pharmaceutical companies reactivate dead farmland and put farms back into healthy profitable business. Farm equipment will be more heavily utilized, keeping that industry healthier. No more government money will be spent to prevent farmers from growing crops decreasing the market value of produce.

j. To defend small businesses manufacturing natural substances from bankruptcy caused by reorganized pharmaceutical giants, establish an association regulating interrelation between traditional and new methods of treatment. To balance the rights of this association and the FDA so that they could have a mutual control of each other in order "not to go overboard" in their actions. Therefore, the new health care will become self-regulating (without the necessity of special government structures to control both organizations). There is the project of maintaining and supporting such an organization without government subsidies. It will use "a fool proof" program to exclude charlatans, ignoramuses from science, workers with hidden mental diseases, etc.

This project represents a very concise narrative of proposed New Reform - Three-in-One. Each described item has a thorough explanation on how to accomplish it in all spheres of real life. Those proposals could be presented when the real necessity to use them arises. New Reform has advantages in comparison with other projects because it really could be started today and will give positive results.

This reform pertains not only to health, it obviously helps to improve the economic condition of the country. By starting and implementing this reform in New York City/State, public opinion about which party the population will trust most will be set because people believe more in deeds than in words.

There is no reason in the world which could justify or explain the violation of human rights. Better health cannot be taken away from the individual. There should be no reason to deny the right of a sick person to be treated with any means available, whatever the individual chooses and needs (under control of doctors provided by new health system - Reform Three-in-One). It should be the constitutional right of every human being! This is a true right, which is part of the democratic freedom which we all proudly cherish in our country and must not give up under any circumstances. The mistakes in governmental laws inherited from the past must be corrected for the sake of better present and future generations. The time has come for a true leader of our country to prioritize the importance of this vital issue and to correct it.

Public Relation Team of Dr. Vladimir Gouliaev

E-mail: prt@tupbiosystems.com